Category One - Scientifically verifiable or reasonable with historical consistency. In our modern world of ever increasing research, knowledge and communication it is pretty difficult to unequivocally state that a certain idea or field of knowledge is completely true.
Beliefs in this category need to be consistent, credible and have some convincing evidence. Certainly there will be a wide variance in what each person considers worthy of this category. Category One forms the core for my Nature’s Way philosophy:
Present core beliefs of Nature's Way
Laws of physics
Evolutionary nature of all living organisms
Category Two - This is the category in which most ideas, phenomena and
knowledge belongs. The major religions no doubt have aspects that belong in the first category but, in total, there is too great a lack of consistency and credible evidence to fit into that category. Research in the sciences are replicated time and time again in an effort to nail down the truth of a certain proposition. Some of this research will finally fit into Category One. Most subjective research and anecdotal commentary on observed phenomena will probably remain in the second category. One advantage of having this category is that a person doesn’t have to make the decision of rejecting certain knowledge but can place that knowledge in this category for further inspection;
Category Two concepts
Religious doctrine, miracles, pronouncements. Social theories, programs, trends. astrology
Psychology and parapsychology
All unexplained phenomena
Medical research still in the process
Category Three - Improbable - If an idea lacks credible evidence, is inconsistent with the world as we know it, and does not fit into the historical aspects of human experience, it is probably safe to reject this idea as being improbable
The hope with these categories is that we don’t get gulled into believing ideas that obstruct progress or are out and out dangerous to mental stability and the safety of those around us.
Is there solace, hope and comfort in this Nature’s Way Philosophy?
Within evolution’s processes and rules there are examples of heart warming beauty and seeming morality. Watching the mothers within the animal kingdom care for their young or an animal that risks its life to save another is something to behold. A recent article in the paper describing a dangerous building fire identified a mother cat as the hero of the event. The cat entered the fire engulfed building three times to bring out her litter. Her face was all burned and she was in bad shape but she got her litter out. It is enough to make you wonder. But I don’t think we can look to the evolutionary process for any kind of lead in terms of morality or philosophical truth. The evolutionary process is focused on the preservation and adaptation of life and is often violent and disgusting in the process. While we must deal with evolution as the central core of our existence, we must look elsewhere for morality, values and truths that are beyond the scope of our physical existence. Perhaps the evolutionary drive for the ubiquitous adaptation to life is a reason for considering the possibility that herein lies the purposes and truths of our existence. Perhaps the answer to our quest for meaning in life is to accentuate the positive and the beautiful in nature and accept as a necessity the brutal and ugly parts of nature. Putting a value judgment on the negative aspects of nature may just be a hang up stemming from a superficial concept of what life is all about. Meaning and truth are tough nuts to crack but somewhere down the road it may all become obvious.
Are there any promises of immortality? Certainly Nature’s Way leaves in limbo some of the most important questions a person may ask about life. The question of immortality is not promised as in Christianity and Islam if you conduct your life in a certain manner and believe certain critical concepts. However, my Nature’s Way Philosophy does not discount the possibility of immortality, only the manner in which it is promised in these great religions. Three thousand years of history have failed to provide convincing evidence of life after death. I’m sure there are millions and millions of people out there that will not agree with that statement and that is OK with me. I can have the same hopes as everyone else but before that concept becomes part of my core belief, I will need some convincing evidence.